Forum Discussion
I believe it is connected with AWS, here is a tracert to AWS west (52.42.109.244)
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 16 ms 9 ms 10 ms 10.71.32.1
3 18 ms 9 ms 9 ms 100.120.104.132
4 11 ms 12 ms 25 ms 100.120.104.12
5 36 ms 12 ms 19 ms 68.1.1.167
6 10 ms 11 ms 14 ms 52.95.218.216
7 36 ms 20 ms 25 ms 54.239.102.66
8 10 ms 19 ms 13 ms 54.239.102.73
9 36 ms 35 ms 39 ms 54.239.42.118
10 * * * Request timed out.
11 48 ms 53 ms 38 ms 52.93.13.6
12 35 ms 44 ms 49 ms 52.93.12.249
13 58 ms 60 ms 75 ms 52.93.12.248
14 38 ms 36 ms 37 ms 52.93.13.25
15 37 ms 54 ms 36 ms 52.93.240.77
16 * * * Request timed out.
17 * * * Request timed out.
18 * * * Request timed out.
19 * * * Request timed out.
20 * * * Request timed out.
21 * * * Request timed out.
22 * * * Request timed out.
23 * * * Request timed out.
24 * * * Request timed out.
25 * * * Request timed out.
26 * * * Request timed out.
27 * * * Request timed out.
28 * * * Request timed out.
29 * * * Request timed out.
30 * * * Request timed out.
- Becky6 years agoModeratorI duplicated this trace, and I also see a slight increase in latency at 68.1.1.167 (your hop 5). This is due to normal ICMP deprioritization. Your traceroute hits the Amazon Web Services (AWS) servers at hop 6. The timeouts once the traceroute reaches the AWS server are expected. Not all AWS servers return ping requests; they block ICMP packets for network security reasons. -Becky, Cox Support Forums Moderator
- Cox_User_Who_Ne6 years agoContributor
So you can't fix this problem cox?
- Cox_User_Who_Ne6 years agoContributor
So can you explain why this fix goes away when i go to a iphone hotspot or go to a friends house with cox and I don't get packet loss there?
- sjo1027846 years agoContributor
In Ping Plotter, you can adjust the trace route protocol. Try switching from normal "ping" requests to UDP packets.
This can be found under "Edit" --> "Options" --> "Packet" - change the "Packet Type" option to "UDP Packets".Cox likes to deflect blame when packet loss is occurring by arguing that normal trace route data is invalid because some hops drop normal ping requests due to them being low priority. While is can be true, changing the packet type will avoid this blame game entirely.
UDP packets are usually connectionless packets in that they do not return a reply. However, when UDP packets are sent to a normally unused UDP port number, the system sending the UDP packet will receive a reply from the destination server essentially saying "UDP packet recieved, but invalid port" - thus showing accurate, non-deprioritized packet travel and undoubtedly showing valid packet loss data.
Related Content
- 7 years ago